0
0
If you’ve ever heard someone confidently declare that “crime is good for the economy,” congratulations — you’ve met a person who has never read an economics paper but has definitely watched a YouTube video with dramatic music and a thumbnail of a man pointing at a graph. Lets look at the economics of crime.
Follow the bigger system behind this story through the Topeka Police Scanner Website article, the history of the Topeka scanner community, and the Topeka Police Scanner radio codes guide.
-
Topeka Police Scanner Website: Features, Facebook Group, and Dystopeka Connection
The main hub connecting the website, Facebook community, and Dystopeka coverage.
-
Topeka Police Scanner History, Community, and Technology
Background on how the scanner scene evolved into a local information network.
-
Topeka Police Scanner Radio Codes
Decode police, fire, and EMS language used on local radio traffic.
-
Topeka and Shawnee County Police and Sheriff’s Radio Codes
Expanded regional code reference for scanner listeners across Shawnee County.
-
Visit the Topeka Police Scanner Website
Go directly to the scanner site for live access, tools, and companion resources.
The truth is less cinematic and far more depressing: Crime doesn’t help the economy — but the way we punish poor people absolutely hurts it.
Let’s break down the myth, the facts, and the fiscal clown show we call “justice.”
Myth #1: Crime Creates Jobs, So It Must Be Good for the Economy
This is the economic equivalent of saying house fires are good because they keep firefighters employed.
Yes, crime generates:
- police budgets
- court costs
- prison construction
- insurance claims
- private security industries
But economists classify these as losses, not gains. They’re like paying someone to break your windows and then paying someone else to fix them.
Crime doesn’t “boost” the economy any more than a car crash boosts your personal finances.
Fact #1: Crime Imposes Enormous Economic Costs
The research is clear: crime drains resources from productive sectors and funnels them into damage control.
For example:
- Mass incarceration costs American families $350 billion per year (www.fwd.us/news/new-report-groundbreaking-analysis-from-fwd-us-finds-incarceration-costs-american-families-nearly-350-billion-each-year)
- Taxpayer analyses show incarceration is one of the least cost‑effective public expenditures (https://evidence2impact.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/s_wifis19c03.pdf)
Crime isn’t an economic engine. It’s an economic sinkhole with a marketing department.
Myth #2: Economists Say We “Need” a Certain Amount of Crime
No economist has ever said, “You know what this GDP needs? More armed robberies.”
What they do say is that eliminating all crime would require:
- total surveillance
- unlimited policing
- a dystopian budget that makes the Pentagon look thrifty
So economists talk about the “optimal level of crime prevention,” not the “optimal level of crime.”
But nuance is hard, and myths are easy.
Fact #2: The Real Economic Disaster Is How We Punish Poor People
Now we get to the fun part — the part where the justice system transforms poverty into a subscription service.
Fines and Fees: America’s Favorite Pay‑to‑Lose Game
Research shows that fines and fees “over‑penalize people living in poverty,” creating a two‑tiered justice system where the wealthy pay a fee and move on, while the poor get financially waterboarded.
Sources:
- Criminalizing Poverty: The Consequences of Court Fees (https://justicelab.columbia.edu/sites/justicelab.columbia.edu/files/content/Criminalizing%20Poverty.pdf)
- Court Fees Criminalize Low-Income Defendants (https://www.irp.wisc.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Focus-on-Poverty-38-2e.pdf)
A $200 fine is:
- annoying for a middle‑class person
- catastrophic for someone choosing between rent and groceries
And when they can’t pay? The system adds more fines, late fees, interest, warrants, and sometimes jail time.
It’s like a credit card company designed by Kafka.
In cities like Topeka, the economics of crime can create a much harsher and darker danger.
Poverty, hunger, desperation and mental illness create a perfect storm in which to incubate some of the worst sorts of violent crime.
Myth #3: Fines Deter Crime
This one is adorable.
A randomized controlled trial found that eliminating court fees had no effect on new charges, convictions, or jail bookings (https://justicelab.columbia.edu/sites/justicelab.columbia.edu/files/content/Criminalizing%20Poverty.pdf).
The Department of Justice also notes that deterrence depends on the certainty of consequences, not the severity (https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/247350.pdf).
Translation: People don’t stop committing crimes because the fine is $500 instead of $200. They stop because they think they’ll get caught.
And spoiler: poor people committing survival crimes aren’t doing cost‑benefit analysis on a spreadsheet.
Fact #3: Fines and Fees Trap People in Perpetual Debt
Court fees create a “feedback loop of debt” that keeps poor defendants entangled in the system for years.
Sources:
- Punished for Poverty: How Fees and Fines Trap the Poor (https://lawreview.vermontlaw.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/49VtLRev88.pdf)
- The Long-Term Impact of Debt Relief for Indigent Defendants (https://finesandfeesjusticecenter.org/articles/the-long-term-impact-of-debt-relief-for-indigent-defendants-in-a-misdemeanor-court/)
Billions of dollars in unpayable court debt accumulate nationwide — owed by people who couldn’t afford the original fine in the first place.
It’s like trying to collect rent from a houseplant.
Myth #4: Fines and Fees Save Taxpayers Money
This is where the comedy becomes tragedy.
Local governments claim fines and fees “recover costs,” but the data shows:
- collection rates are low
- administrative costs are high
- enforcement costs are even higher
In many jurisdictions, it costs more to collect fines than the fines are worth.
It’s the fiscal equivalent of spending $20 in gas to drive across town and collect $5 someone owes you.
Fact #4: Taxpayers Pay More Because We Criminalize Poverty
When people can’t pay fines, the system escalates:
- warrants
- arrests
- jail time
- probation
- additional hearings
All of which cost taxpayers far more than the original fine would have generated.
And that’s before we even get to the cost of incarcerating people who committed:
- theft of food
- petty drug possession
- crimes tied to homelessness
- crimes tied to untreated depression
- crimes tied to feeding their families
We’re not just punishing poverty. We’re funding the punishment of poverty, thats the economics of crime
The Real Bottom Line: Crime Isn’t the Problem — Poverty Is
The U.S. doesn’t have a “criminal economy.” It has a poverty economy — and crime is one of its predictable symptoms.
People commit low‑level offenses because:
- they’re hungry
- they’re cold
- they’re depressed
- they’re self‑medicating
- they’re trying to survive
And instead of addressing root causes, we slap them with fines they can’t pay, then punish them for not paying, then incarcerate them at enormous public expense.
It’s a system designed by someone who has never met a poor person but has very strong opinions about them.
Final Verdict: Myth Busted, System Indicted
Here’s your myth‑versus‑fact summary: economics of crime
| Claim | Verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| “Crime boosts the economy” | ❌ Myth | Crime creates costs, not value. |
| “We need crime for economic health” | ❌ Myth | Economists say eliminating all crime is impossible, not desirable. |
| “Fines deter crime” | ❌ Myth | Research shows no deterrent effect. |
| “Fines punish the poor more harshly” | ✔️ Fact | They over‑penalize people in poverty. |
| “Court fees trap people in debt” | ✔️ Fact | Billions in unpayable fees accumulate. |
| “Fines save taxpayers money” | ❌ Myth | Enforcement costs exceed revenue. |
Crime doesn’t help the economy. But the way we respond to crime? That absolutely wrecks it.
This article is connected to newer related coverage and supporting context below.
🔁 Keep Reading
Related Dystopeka reporting and context:
